Sukhbir Badal Declared “Tankhaiya” by Takht Patna Sahib
Takht Patna Sahib has officially declared Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Badal as “tankhaiya,” a term used for individuals guilty of religious misconduct. This decision follows Badal’s failure to appear before the religious authority despite repeated summons.
Continuous Summons Ignored
In a significant turn of events, Sukhbir Badal did not heed multiple calls to appear before the Panj Pyaras, a group of five revered figures at the Bihar-based Takht. Instead, representatives from his party conveyed that the SAD leader would abide by the directives given by the Akal Takht Jathedar in matters of religious importance.
Allegations of Interference
On May 21, the Panj Pyaras summoned Badal within a strict timeline of 10 days, raising concerns regarding his alleged interference in the operational activities of the Takht. This move highlights ongoing tensions and allegations surrounding the governance of religious institutions in the Sikh community.
Consequences for Other Leaders
In a related development, Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj, officiating Jathedar of Akal Takht, and Baba Tek Singh, Jathedar of Takht Damdama Sahib, were also declared “tankhaiya.” The Panj Pyaras held them accountable for reinstating Giani Ranjit Singh Gauhar, who had previously been excommunicated from Takht Patna Sahib.
Health Concerns Cited by Badal
Amidst the controversy, Sukhbir Badal cited ill health as a reason for his non-appearance. Recognizing his situation, the Takht issued a new edict in mid-June, granting him an additional 20 days to comply with their request for a formal appearance.
The Religious Significance of Takht Patna Sahib
Takht Patna Sahib holds immense religious significance in Sikhism as one of the five Takhts, or seats of authority, in the Sikh faith. Decisions made here, particularly by the Panj Pyaras, can have a lasting impact on the spiritual and social landscape of the Sikh community.
Implications for SAD and Sikh Politics
The ongoing developments raise critical questions about the role of political leaders in religious affairs. Sukhbir Badal’s failure to appear may not only affect his political standing but could also influence the relationship between religious and political entities within the Sikh community.
